KINGDOM OF GOD
The expression and exercise of God’s universal sovereignty toward his creatures, or the means or instrumentality used by him for this purpose. (Ps. 103:19) The phrase is used particularly for the expression of God’s sovereignty through a royal administration headed by his Son, Christ Jesus.
The word rendered “kingdom” in the Christian Greek Scriptures is ba·si·leiʹa, meaning “a kingdom, realm, the region or country governed by a king; kingly power, authority, dominion, reign; royal dignity, the title and honour of king.” (The Analytical Greek Lexicon, p. 67) The phrase “the kingdom of God” is used frequently by Mark and Luke, and in Matthew’s account the parallel phrase “the kingdom of the heavens” appears some thirty times.—Compare Mark 10:23 and Luke 18:24 with Matthew 19:23, 24; see HEAVEN (Spiritual Heavens); KINGDOM.
The government of God is, in structure and function, a pure theocracy (from Greek the·osʹ, god, and kraʹtos, a rule), a rule by God. The term “theocracy” is attributed to Jewish historian Josephus of the first century C.E., who evidently coined it in his writing Against Apion (Book II, par. 17). Of the government established over Israel in Sinai, Josephus wrote: “Some legislators have permitted their governments to be under monarchies, others put them under oligarchies, and others under a republican form; but our legislator [referring to Moses] had no regard to any of these forms, but he ordained our government to be what, by a strained [coined] expression, may be termed a Theocracy [Gr., The·o·kra·tiʹan], by ascribing the authority and the power to God.” To be a pure theocracy, of course, the government could not be ordained by any human legislator, such as the man Moses, but must be ordained and established by God. The Scriptural record shows this was the case.
ORIGIN OF THE TERM
The term “king” (Heb., meʹlekh) evidently came into use in human language after the global flood. The first earthly kingdom was that of Nimrod “a mighty hunter in opposition to Jehovah.” (Gen. 10:8-12) Thereafter, during the period down to Abraham’s time, city-states and nations developed and human kings multiplied. With the exception of the kingdom of Melchizedek, king-priest of Salem (who served as a prophetic type of the Messiah [Gen. 14:17-20; Heb. 7:1-17]), none of these earthly kingdoms represented God’s rule or were established by him. Men also made kings of the false gods they worshiped, attributing to them the ability to grant power of rulership to humans. Jehovah’s application of the title “King [Meʹlekh]” to himself, as found in the post-Flood writings of the Hebrew Scriptures, therefore meant God’s making use of the title men had developed and employed. God’s use of the term showed that he, and not presumptuous human rulers or man-made gods, should be looked to and obeyed as “King.”—Jer. 10:10-12.
Jehovah had, of course, been Sovereign Ruler long before human kingdoms developed, in fact before humans existed. As the true God and as their Creator, he was respected and obeyed by angelic sons numbering into the millions. (Job 38:4-7; 2 Chron. 18:18; Ps. 103:20-22; Dan. 7:10) By whatever title, then, he was, from the beginning of creation, recognized as the One whose will was rightfully supreme.
GOD’S RULERSHIP IN EARLY HUMAN HISTORY
The first human creatures, Adam and Eve, likewise knew Jehovah as God the Creator of heaven and earth. They recognized his authority, his right to issue commands, to call upon them to perform certain duties or to refrain from certain acts, to assign land for residence and cultivation, as well as to delegate authority over others of his creatures. (Gen. 1:26-30; 2:15-17) Though Adam had the ability to coin words (Gen. 2:19, 20), there is no evidence that he developed the title “king [meʹlekh]” to apply it to his God and Creator, although he recognized Jehovah’s supreme authority.
As revealed in the initial chapters of Genesis, God’s exercise of his sovereignty toward man in Eden was benevolent and not unduly restrictive. The relationship between God and man called for obedience such as that a son renders to his father. (Compare Luke 3:38.) Man had no lengthy code of laws to fulfill (compare 1 Timothy 1:8-11); God’s requirements were simple and purposeful. Nor is there anything to indicate that Adam was made to feel inhibited by constant, critical supervision of his every action; rather, God’s communication with perfect man seems to have been periodic, according to need.—Gen. chaps. 1-3.
A new expression of God’s rulership purposed
The first human pair’s open violation of God’s command, instigated by one of God’s spirit sons, was actually rebellion against divine authority. (Gen. 3:17-19; see TREES.) The position taken by God’s spirit adversary (Heb., sa·tanʹ) constituted a challenge calling for a test, the issue being the rightfulness of Jehovah’s universal sovereignty. (See JEHOVAH [The supreme issue a moral one].) The earth, where the issue was raised, is fittingly the place where it will be settled.—Rev. 12:7-12.
At the time of pronouncing judgment upon the first rebels, Jehovah God spoke a prophecy, couched in symbolic phrase, setting forth his purpose to use an agency, a “seed,” to effect the ultimate crushing of the rebel forces. (Gen. 3:15) Thus, Jehovah’s rulership, the expression of his sovereignty, would take on a new aspect or expression in answer to the insurrection that had developed. The progressive revelation of the “sacred secrets of the kingdom” (Matt. 13:11) showed that this new aspect would involve the formation of a subsidiary government, a governing body headed by a deputy ruler. The realization of the promise of the “seed” is in the kingdom of Christ Jesus in union with his chosen associates. (Rev. 17:14; see JESUS CHRIST [His vital place in God’s purpose].) From the time of the Edenic promise forward the progressive development of God’s purpose to produce this kingdom “seed” becomes the theme of the Bible and the key to understanding Jehovah’s actions toward his servants and toward mankind in general.
God’s delegating vast authority and power to creatures (Matt. 28:18; Rev. 2:26, 27; 3:21) in this way is noteworthy inasmuch as the question of the integrity of all God’s creatures, that is, their wholehearted devotion to him and their loyalty to his headship, formed a vital part of the issue raised by God’s adversary. (See INTEGRITY [Involved in the supreme issue].) That God could confidently entrust any of his creatures with such remarkable authority and power would in itself be a splendid testimony to the moral strength of his rule, contributing to the vindication of Jehovah’s name and position and exposing the falsity of his adversary’s allegations.
Mankind’s need for divine government manifested
The conditions that developed from the time of the start of human rebellion until the time of the Flood clearly illustrated mankind’s need for divine headship. Human society soon had to contend with disunity, bodily assault and murder. (Gen. 4:2-9, 23, 24) To what extent the sinner Adam, during his 930 years of life, exercised patriarchal authority over his multiplying descendants is not revealed. But by the seventh generation shocking ungodliness evidently existed (Jude 14, 15) and by the time of Noah (born about 120 years after Adam’s death) conditions had deteriorated to the point that “the earth became filled with violence.” (Gen. 6:1-13) Contributing to this condition was the unauthorized interjection of spirit creatures into human society, contrary to God’s will and purpose.—Gen. 6:1-4; Jude 6; 2 Pet. 2:4, 5; see NEPHILIM.
Though earth had become a focus of rebellion, Jehovah did not relinquish his dominion over it. The global flood was evidence that God’s power and ability to enforce his will on earth, as in any part of the universe, continued. During the pre-Flood period he likewise demonstrated his willingness to guide and govern the actions of those individuals who sought him, such as Abel, Enoch and Noah. Noah’s case in particular illustrates God’s exercise of rulership toward a willing earthly subject, giving him commands and direction, protecting and blessing him and his family, as well as evidencing God’s control over the other earthly creation, animals and birds. (Gen. 6:9–7:16) Jehovah likewise made clear that he would not allow alienated human society to corrupt the earth endlessly; that he had not restricted himself as to executing his righteous judgment against wrongdoers when and as he saw fit. Additionally he demonstrated his sovereign ability to control earth’s atmosphere and created elements.—Gen. 6:3, 5-7; 7:17–8:22.
The early post-Flood society and its problems
Following the Flood, a patriarchal arrangement apparently was the basic structure of human society, providing a measure of stability and order. Mankind was to “fill the earth,” which called not merely for procreating but for the steady extension of the area of human habitation throughout the globe. (Gen. 9:1, 7) These factors, of themselves, would reasonably have had a limiting effect on any social problems, keeping them generally within the family circle, making unlikely the friction that frequently develops where density of population or crowded conditions exist. The unauthorized project at Babel, however, called for an opposite course, for a concentrating of people, avoiding being “scattered over all the surface of the earth.” (Gen. 11:1-4; see LANGUAGE [Multiplication of human languages].) Then, too, Nimrod departed from the patriarchal rule and set up the first “kingdom” (Heb., mam·la·khahʹ). A Cushite of the family line of Ham, he invaded Shemite territory, the land of Asshur (or Assyria), and built cities there as part of his realm.—Gen. 10:8-12.
God’s confusion of human language broke up the concentration of people on the plains of Shinar, but the pattern of rulership begun by Nimrod was generally followed in the lands to which the various families of mankind migrated. In the days of Abraham (c. 2018-1843 B.C.E.) kingdoms were active from Asian Mesopotamia on down to African Egypt, where the king was titled “Pharaoh” rather than Meʹlekh. But these kingships did not bring security. Kings were soon forming military alliances, waging far-ranging campaigns of aggression, plunder and kidnapping. (Gen. 14:1-12) In some cities strangers were subject to attack by homosexuals.—Gen. 19:4-9.
Thus, whereas men doubtless banded together in concentrated communities in search of security (compare Genesis 4:14-17), they soon found it necessary to wall their cities and eventually fortify them against armed attack. The earliest secular records known, many of them from the Mesopotamian region where Nimrod’s kingdom had originally operated, are heavy with accounts of human conflict, greed, intrigue and bloodshed. The most ancient non-Biblical law records found, such as those of Lipit-Ishtar, Eshunna, and Hammurabi, show that human living had become very complex, with social friction producing problems of theft, fraud, commercial difficulties, disputes about property and payment of rent, questions regarding loans and interest, marital infidelity, medical fees and failures, assault and battery cases, and many other matters. Though Hammurabi called himself the “efficient king” and the “perfect king,” his rule and legislation, like that of the other ancient political kingdoms, was incapable of solving the problems of sinful mankind. (Ancient Near Eastern Texts, by Pritchard, pp. 159-180; compare Proverbs 28:5.) In all these kingdoms religion was prominent, but not the worship of the true God. Though the priesthood collaborated closely with the ruling class and enjoyed royal favor, this brought no moral improvement to the people. The cuneiform inscriptions of the ancient religious writings are devoid of spiritual uplift or moral guidance; they betray the gods worshiped as quarrelsome, violent, lustful, not governed by righteous standards or purpose. Men needed Jehovah God’s kingdom if they were to enjoy life in peace and happiness.
GOD’S EXERCISE OF KINGLY POWER
TOWARD ABRAHAM AND HIS DESCENDANTS
True, those individuals who looked to Jehovah God as their Head were not without their personal problems and frictions. Yet they were helped to solve these (or to endure them) in a way conforming to God’s righteous standards and without becoming degraded. They were afforded divine protection and strength. (Gen. 13:5-11; 14:18-24; 19:15-24; 21:9-13, 22-33) Thus, after pointing out that Jehovah’s “judicial decisions are in all the earth,” the psalmist says of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob: “They happened to be few in number, yes, very few, and alien residents in [Canaan]. And they kept walking about from nation to nation, from one kingdom to another people. [Jehovah] did not allow any human to defraud them, but on their account he reproved kings, saying: ‘Do not you men touch my anointed ones, and to my prophets do nothing bad.’” (Ps. 105:7-15; compare Genesis 12:10-20; 20:1-18; 31:22-24, 36-55.) This, too, was proof that God’s sovereignty over earth was still in effect, enforceable by him in harmony with the development of his purpose.
The faithful patriarchs did not attach themselves to any of the city-states or kingdoms of Canaan or other lands. Rather than seek security in some city under the political rule of a human king, they lived in tents as aliens, “strangers and temporary residents in the land,” in faith “awaiting the city having real foundations, the builder and creator of which city is God.” They accepted God as their Ruler, waited for his future heavenly arrangement or agency for governing the earth, solidly founded on his sovereign authority and will, though the realization of this hope was then “afar off.” (Heb. 11:8-10, 13-16) Thus, Jesus, already anointed by God to be king, could later say: “Abraham . . . rejoiced greatly in the prospect of seeing my day, and he saw it and rejoiced.”—John 8:56.
Jehovah brought the development of his promise regarding the kingdom “seed” (Gen. 3:15) a step farther by the establishing of a covenant with Abraham. (Gen. 12:1-3; 22:15-18) In connection therewith, he foretold that ‘kings would come’ from Abraham (Abram) and his wife. (Gen. 17:1-6, 15, 16) Though the descendants of Abraham’s grandson Esau formed sheikdoms and kingdoms, it was to Abraham’s other grandson, Jacob, that God’s prophetic promise of kingly descendants was repeated.—Gen. 35:11, 12; 36:9, 15-43.
Formation of the Israelite nation
Centuries later, at the due time (Gen. 15:13-16), Jehovah God acted on behalf of Jacob’s descendants, now numbering into the millions (see EXODUS [The number involved in the Exodus), protecting them during a campaign of genocide by the Egyptian government (Ex. 1:15-22) and finally freeing them from harsh slavery to Egypt’s regime. (Ex. 2:23-25) God’s command to Pharaoh, delivered through his agents Moses and Aaron, was spurned by the Egyptian ruler as proceeding from a source with no authority over Egyptian affairs. Pharaoh’s repeated refusal to recognize Jehovah’s sovereignty brought demonstrations of divine power in the form of plagues. (Ex. chaps. 7 to 12) God thereby proved that his dominion over earth’s elements and creatures was superior to that of any king in all the earth. (Ex. 9:13-16) He climaxed this display of sovereign power by destroying Pharaoh’s forces in a way that none of the boastful warrior kings of the nations could ever have duplicated. (Ex. 14:26-31) With real basis, Moses and the Israelites sang: “Jehovah will rule as king to time indefinite, even forever.”—Ex. 15:1-19.
Thereafter Jehovah gave added proof of his dominion over earth, its vital water resources and its bird life, and his ability to guard and sustain the nation even in arid and hostile surroundings. (Ex. 15:22–17:15) Having done all of this, he addressed the liberated people, telling them that, by obedience to his authority and covenant, they could become his special property out of all other peoples, “because the whole earth belongs to me.” They could become “a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” (Ex. 19:3-6) When they went on record as willing subjects of his sovereignty, Jehovah acted as kingly Legislator by giving them royal decrees in a large body of laws, accompanying this by dynamic and awe-inspiring evidence of his power and glory. (Ex. 19:7–24:18) A tabernacle or tent of meeting, and particularly its ark, was to symbolize the presence of the invisible heavenly Head of State. (Ex. 25:8, 21, 22; 33:7-11; compare Revelation 21:3.) Although Moses and other appointed men judged the majority of cases, guided by God’s law, Jehovah intervened personally at times to express judgments and apply sanctions against lawbreakers. (Ex. 18:13-16, 24-26; 32:25-35) The ordained priesthood acted to maintain good relations between the nation and its heavenly Ruler, aiding the people in their efforts to conform to the high standards of the Law covenant. (See PRIEST.) Thus the government over Israel was a genuine “theocracy.”—Deut. 33:2, 5.
As God and Creator, holding the right of “eminent domain” over all the earth, as well as being the “Judge of all the earth” (Gen. 18:25), Jehovah had assigned the land of Canaan to Abraham’s seed. (Gen. 12:5-7; 15:17-21) As Chief Executive he now ordered the Israelites to carry out the forcible expropriation of the territory held by condemned Canaanites, as well as his death sentence against them.—Deut. 9:1-5; see CANAAN, CANAANITE (Basis for extermination).
The period of the Judges
For three and a half centuries after Israel’s conquest of Canaan’s many kingdoms, Jehovah God was the nation’s only king. During varying periods, judges, chosen by God, led the nation or portions thereof in battle and in peace. Judge Gideon’s defeat of Midian brought a popular request that he become the nation’s ruler, but he refused, acknowledging Jehovah as the true ruler. (Judg. 8:22, 23) His ambitious son Abimelech briefly established kingship over a small segment of the nation, but ended in personal disaster.—Judg. 9:1, 6, 22, 53-56.
Of this general period of the Judges, the comment is made: “In those days there was no king in Israel. As for everybody, what was right in his own eyes he was accustomed to do.” (Judg. 17:6; 21:25) This does not imply that there was no judicial restraint. Every city had judges, older men, to handle legal questions and problems, meting out justice. (Deut. 16:18-20; see COURT, JUDICIAL.) The Levitical priesthood functioned as a superior guiding force, educating the people in God’s law, the high priest having the Urim and Thummim by which to consult God on difficult matters. (See PRIEST; HIGH PRIEST.) So, the individual who availed himself of these provisions, who gained knowledge of God’s law and applied it, had a sound guide for his conscience. His doing “what was right in his own eyes” in such case would not result in bad. Jehovah allowed the people to show a willing or unwilling attitude and course. There was no human monarch over the nation supervising the work of the city judges or commanding the citizens to engage in particular projects or marshaling them for defense of the nation. (Compare Judges 5:1-18.) The bad conditions that developed, therefore, were chargeable to the unwillingness of the majority to heed the word and law of their heavenly King and to avail themselves of his provisions.—Judg. 2:11-23.
A HUMAN KING REQUESTED
Nearly four hundred years from the time of the Exodus and over eight hundred years from the making of God’s covenant with Abraham, the Israelites requested a human king to lead them, even as the other nations had human monarchs. Their request constituted a rejection of Jehovah’s own kingship over them. (1 Sam. 8:4-8) True, the people properly expected a kingdom to be established by God in harmony with his promise to Abraham and to Jacob, already cited. They had further basis for such hope in Jacob’s deathbed prophecy concerning Judah (Gen. 49:8-10), in Jehovah’s words to Israel after the Exodus (Ex. 19:3-6), in the terms of the Law covenant (Deut. 17:14, 15), and even in part of the message God caused the prophet Balaam to speak. (Num. 24:2-7, 17) Samuel’s faithful mother Hannah expressed this hope in prayer. (1 Sam. 2:7-10) Nevertheless, Jehovah had not fully revealed his “sacred secret” regarding the Kingdom, had not indicated when his due time for its establishment would arrive or the structure and composition of that government, whether it would be earthly or heavenly. It was therefore presumptuous on the part of the people now to make demand for a human king.
The menace of Philistine and Ammonite aggression evidently contributed to the Israelites’ desire for a visible royal commander-in-chief. They thus displayed a lack of faith in God’s ability to protect, guide and provide for them, as a nation or as individuals. (1 Sam. 8:4-8) The people’s motive was wrong; yet Jehovah God granted their request, not for their sake primarily, but to accomplish his own good purpose in the progressive revelation of the “sacred secret” of his future kingdom by the “seed.” Human kingship would bring its problems and expense for Israel, however, and Jehovah laid the facts before the people.—1 Sam. 8:9-22.
The kings thereafter appointed by Jehovah were to serve as God’s earthly agents, not diminishing in the least Jehovah’s own sovereignty over the nation. The throne was actually Jehovah’s and they sat thereon as deputy kings. (1 Chron. 29:23) Jehovah commanded the anointing of the first king, Saul (1 Sam. 9:15-17), at the same time exposing the lack of faith the nation had displayed.—1 Sam. 10:17-25.
For the kingship to bring benefits, both king and nation must now respect God’s authority. If they unrealistically looked to other sources for direction and protection, they and their king would be swept away. (Deut. 28:36; 1 Sam. 12:13-15, 20-25) The king was to avoid reliance on military strength, avoid the multiplying of wives for himself, not be dominated by the lust for wealth. His kingship was to operate entirely within the framework of the Law covenant. He was under divine orders to write his own copy of that Law and read it daily, that he might keep a proper fear of the Sovereign Authority, stay humble and hold to a righteous course. (Deut. 17:16-20) To the extent that he did this, loving God wholeheartedly and loving his neighbor as himself, his rule would bring blessings, with no real cause for complaint due to oppression or hardship. But, as with the people, so now with their kings, Jehovah allowed the rulers to demonstrate what their hearts contained, their willingness or unwillingness to recognize God’s own authority and will.
DAVID’S EXEMPLARY RULE
The Benjamite Saul’s disrespect for the superior authority and arrangements of the “Excellency of Israel” brought divine disfavor and cost his family line the throne. (1 Sam. 13:10-14; 15:17-29; 1 Chron. 10:13, 14) With the rule of his successor, David of Judah, Jacob’s deathbed prophecy saw further fulfillment. (Gen. 49:8-10) Though committing errors through human weakness, David’s rule was exemplary because of his heartfelt devotion to Jehovah God, his humble submission to divine authority. (Ps. 51:1-4; 1 Sam. 24:10-14; compare 1 Kings 11:4; 15:11, 14.) At the time of receiving contributions for the temple construction, David prayed to God before the congregated people, saying: “Yours, O Jehovah, are the greatness and the mightiness and the beauty and the excellency and the dignity; for everything in the heavens and in the earth is yours. Yours is the kingdom, O Jehovah, the One also lifting yourself up as head over all. The riches and the glory are on account of you, and you are dominating everything; and in your hand there are power and mightiness, and in your hand is ability to make great and to give strength to all. And now, O our God, we are thanking you and praising your beauteous name.” (1 Chron. 29:10-13) His final counsel to his son Solomon also illustrates David’s fine viewpoint of the relationship between the earthly kingship and its divine Source.—1 Ki. 2:1-4.
On the occasion of bringing the ark of the covenant, symbolizing Jehovah’s presence, to the capital, Jerusalem, David sang: “Let the heavens rejoice, let the earth be joyful, and let them say among the nations, ‘Jehovah himself has become king!’” (1 Chron. 16:1, 7, 23-31) This illustrates the fact that, though Jehovah’s rulership dates from the beginning of creation, he can make specific expressions of his rulership or establish certain agencies to represent him that allow for his being spoken of as ‘becoming king’ at a particular time or occasion.
The covenant for a kingdom
Jehovah made a covenant with David for a kingdom to be established everlastingly in his family line, saying: “I shall certainly raise up your seed after you, . . . and I shall indeed firmly establish his kingdom. . . . And your house and your kingdom will certainly be steadfast to time indefinite before you; your very throne will become one firmly established to time indefinite.” (2 Sam. 7:12-16; 1 Chron. 17:11-14) This covenant in force toward the Davidic dynasty provided further evidence of the outworking of God’s Edenic promise for his kingdom by the foretold “seed” (Gen. 3:15), and supplied additional means for identifying that “seed” when he should come. (Compare Isaiah 9:6, 7; 1 Peter 1:11.) The kings appointed by God were anointed for their office, hence the term “messiah,” meaning “anointed one,” applied to them. (1 Sam. 16:1; Ps. 132:13, 17) Clearly, then, the earthly kingdom Jehovah established over Israel served as a type or small-scale representation of the coming Kingdom by the Messiah, Jesus Christ, “son of David.”—Matt. 1:1.
DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ISRAELITE KINGDOMS
Human kingship did not solve Israel’s problems, however. Conditions at the end of just three reigns and the start of the fourth produced strong discontent that led to revolt and a split in the nation (997 B.C.E.). A northern kingdom and a southern one resulted. Jehovah’s covenant with David nevertheless continued in force toward the kings of the southern kingdom of Judah. Over the centuries, faithful kings were rare in Judah, and were completely lacking in the northern kingdom of Israel. The northern kingdom’s history was one of idolatry, intrigue and assassinations, kings often following one another in rapid succession. The people suffered injustice and oppression. About two hundred and fifty years from its start, Jehovah allowed the king of Assyria to crush the northern kingdom due to its course of rebellion against God (740 B.C.E.).—Hos. 4:1, 2; Amos 2:6-8.
Though the kingdom of Judah enjoyed greater stability because of the Davidic dynasty, the southern kingdom eventually surpassed the northern kingdom in its moral corruption, despite the efforts of God-fearing kings, such as Hezekiah and Josiah, to roll back the decline toward idolatry and rejection of Jehovah’s word and authority. (Isa. 1:1-4; Ezek. 23:1-4, 11) Social injustice, tyranny, greed, dishonesty, bribes, sexual perversion, criminal attacks and bloodshed, and religious hypocrisy that converted God’s temple into a “cave of robbers”—all of these were decried by Jehovah’s prophets in their warning messages delivered to rulers and people. (Isa. 1:15-17, 21-23; 3:14, 15; Jer. 5:1, 2, 7, 8, 26-28, 31; 6:6, 7; 7:8-11) Neither the support of apostate priests nor any political alliance made with other nations could avoid the coming crash of that unfaithful kingdom. (Jer. 6:13-15; 37:7-10) The capital city, Jerusalem, was destroyed and Judah laid waste by the Babylonians in 607 B.C.E.—2 Ki. 25:1-26.
Jehovah’s kingly position remains unmarred
The destruction of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah in no way reflected on the quality of Jehovah God’s own rulership, in no way indicated weakness on his part. Throughout the history of the Israelite nation, Jehovah made clear that his interest was in willing service and obedience. (Deut. 10:12-21; 30:6, 15-20; Isa. 1:18-20; Ezek. 18:25-32) He instructed, reproved, disciplined, warned and punished. But he did not use his power to force king or people to follow a righteous course. The bad conditions that developed, the suffering experienced, the disaster that befell them, were all of their own making, because they stubbornly hardened their hearts and insisted on following an independent course, one that was stupidly damaging to their own best interests.—Lam. 1:8, 9; Neh. 9:26-31, 34-37; Isa. 1:2-7; Jer. 8:5-9; Hos. 7:10, 11.
Jehovah exhibited his Sovereign power by holding in abeyance the aggressive, rapacious powers of Assyria and Babylon until his own due time, even maneuvering them so that they acted in fulfillment of his prophecies. (Ezek. 21:18-23; Isa. 10:5-7) When Jehovah finally removed his defenses from around the nation, it was an expression of his righteous judgment as Sovereign Ruler. (Jer. 35:17) The desolation of Israel and Judah came as no shocking surprise to God’s obedient servants who were forewarned by his prophecies. The abasing of haughty rulers exalted Jehovah’s own “splendid superiority.” (Isa. 2:1, 10-17) More than all of this, however, he had demonstrated his ability to protect and preserve individuals who looked to him as their King, even when they were surrounded by conditions of famine, disease and wholesale slaughter, as well as being persecuted by those hating righteousness.—Jer. 34:17-21; 20:10, 11; 35:18, 19; 36:26; 37:18-21; 38:7-13; 39:11–40:5.
Israel’s last king was warned of the coming removal of his crown, representing anointed kingship as Jehovah’s royal representative. That anointed Davidic kingship would no longer be exercised “until he comes who has the legal right, and I [Jehovah] must give it to him.” (Ezek. 21:25-27) Thus, the typical kingdom, now in ruins, ceased to function, and attention was again directed forward, toward the coming “seed,” the Messiah.
Political nations, such as Assyria and Babylon, devastated the apostate kingdoms of Israel and Judah. Though God speaks of himself as ‘raising up’ or ‘bringing’ them against those condemned kingdoms (Deut. 28:49; Jer. 5:15; 25:8, 9; Ezek. 7:24; Amos 6:14), this was evidently in a sense similar to God’s ‘hardening’ the heart of Pharaoh. (See FOREKNOWLEDGE, FOREORDINATION [Foreknowledge concerning individuals].) That is, God ‘brought, these attacking forces by permitting them to carry out the desire already in their heart (Isa. 10:7; Lam. 2:16; Mic. 4:11), removing his protective ‘hand’ from over the objects of their ambitious greed. (Deut. 31:17, 18; compare Ezra 8:31 with 5:12; Nehemiah 9:28-31; Jeremiah 34:2.) The apostate Israelites, stubbornly refusing to subject themselves to Jehovah’s law and will, thus were given ‘liberty to the sword, pestilence and famine.’ (Jer. 34:17) But the attacking pagan nations did not thereby become approved of God, nor did they have ‘clean hands’ before him in their ruthless destruction of the northern and southern kingdoms, the capital city of Jerusalem and its sacred temple. Hence, Jehovah, the “Judge of all the earth,” could rightly denounce them for ‘pillaging his inheritance,’ and doom them to suffer the same desolation they had wreaked on his covenant people.—Isa. 10:12-14; 13:1, 17-22; 14:4-6, 12-14, 26, 27; 47:5-11; Jer. 50:11, 14, 17-19, 23-29.
VISIONS OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD IN DANIEL’S DAY
The prophecy of Daniel in its entirety emphatically stresses the theme of the Universal Sovereignty of God, further clarifying Jehovah’s purpose. Exiled, living in the capital of the world power that overthrew Judah, Daniel was used by God to reveal the significance of a vision had by the Babylonian monarch, thereby foretelling the march of world powers and their eventual demolition by an everlasting kingdom of Jehovah’s own establishment. Doubtless, to the sheer amazement of his royal court, Nebuchadnezzar, the very conqueror of Jerusalem, was now moved to prostrate himself in homage to Daniel the exile and to acknowledge Daniel’s God as “a Lord of kings.” (Dan. 2:36-47) Again, by Nebuchadnezzar’s dream vision of the ‘chopped-down tree,’ Jehovah forcefully made known that “the Most High is Ruler in the kingdom of mankind and that to the one whom he wants to, he gives it and he sets up over it even the lowliest one of mankind.” (Dan. chap. 4; see the discussion of this vision under APPOINTED TIMES OF THE NATIONS.) Through the fulfillment of the dream as it related to him, imperial ruler Nebuchadnezzar once more was brought to recognize Daniel’s God as “the King of the heavens,” the One who “is doing according to his own will among the army of the heavens and the inhabitants of the earth. And there exists no one that can check his hand or that can say to him, ‘What have you been doing?’”—Dan. 4:34-37.
Toward the close of Babylon’s international dominance, Daniel saw prophetic visions of successive empires, beastlike in their characteristics, saw also Jehovah’s majestic heavenly Court in session, passing judgment on the world powers, decreeing them unworthy of rulership, and beheld “someone like a son of man . . . [being] given rulership and dignity and kingdom, that the peoples, national groups and languages should all serve even him” in his “indefinitely lasting rulership that will not pass away.” He witnessed as well the war waged against “the holy ones” by the final world power, calling for its annihilation, and the giving of “the kingdom and the rulership and the grandeur of the kingdoms under all the heavens . . . to the people who are the holy ones of the Supreme One,” Jehovah God. (Dan. chaps. 7, 8) Thus, it became evident that the promised “seed” would involve a governmental body with not only a kingly head, the “son of man,” but also associate rulers, the “holy ones of the Supreme One.”
EXPRESSIONS OF GOD’S KINGLY POWER
TOWARD BABYLON AND MEDO-PERSIA
God’s inexorable decree against mighty Babylon was carried out suddenly and unexpectedly; her days were numbered and brought to a finish. (Dan. 5:17-30) During the Medo-Persian rule that followed, Jehovah made further revelation concerning the Messianic Kingdom, pointing to the time of Messiah’s appearance, foretelling his being “cut off,” as well as a second destruction of the city of Jerusalem and its holy place. (Dan. 9:1, 24-27; see SEVENTY WEEKS.) And, as he had done during the Babylonian rule, Jehovah God again demonstrated his ability to protect those recognizing his sovereignty in the face of official anger and the threat of death, exhibiting his power over both earthly elements and wild beasts. (Dan. 3:13-29; 6:12-27) He caused Babylon’s gates to swing wide open on schedule, allowing his covenant people to have the freedom to return to their own land and rebuild Jerusalem and God’s house there. (2 Chron. 36:20-23) Because of his act of liberating his people the announcement could be made to Zion, “Your God has become king!” (Isa. 52:7-11) Thereafter, conspiracies against his people were thwarted, misrepresentation by subordinate officials and adverse governmental decrees were overcome, as Jehovah moved various Persian kings to cooperate with the carrying out of his own sovereign will.—Ezra chaps. 4-7; Neh. chaps. 2, 4, 6; Esther chaps. 3-9.
Thus, for thousands of years the changeless, irresistible purpose of Jehovah God moved forward. Regardless of the turn of events on earth, he proved to be ever in command of the situation, always ahead of opposing man and devil. Nothing was allowed to interfere with the perfect outworking of his purpose, his will. The nation of Israel and its history, while serving to form prophetic types and forecasts of the future dealings of God with men, also illustrated that without wholehearted recognition and submission to divine headship there can be no lasting harmony, peace and happiness. The Israelites enjoyed the benefits of having in common such things as race, ancestry, language and country. They also faced common foes. But only as long as they loyally and faithfully worshiped and served Jehovah God did they have unity, strength, justice, and genuine enjoyment of life. When the bonds of relationship with Jehovah God weakened, the nation deteriorated rapidly.
THE KINGDOM OF GOD ‘DRAWS NEAR’
Since the Messiah must be a descendant of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, a member of the tribe of Judah, and a “son of David,” he must have a human birth; he must be, as Daniel’s prophecy declared, “a son of man.” When the “full limit of the time arrived,” Jehovah God sent forth his Son, who was born of a woman and who fulfilled all the legal requirements for the inheritance of “the throne of David his father.” (Gal. 4:4; Luke 1:26-33; see GENEALOGY OF JESUS CHRIST.) Six months before his birth, John, who became the “Baptist” and who was to be Jesus’ forerunner, had been born. (Luke 1:13-17, 36) The expressions of the parents of these sons showed they were living in eager anticipation of divine acts of rulership. (Luke 1:41-55, 68-79) At Jesus’ birth, the words of the angelic deputation sent to announce the meaning of the event also pointed to glorious acts by God. (Luke 2:9-14) So, too, the words of Simeon and Anna at the temple expressed hope in saving acts and liberation. (Luke 2:25-38) Both Biblical and secular evidence reveal that a general feeling of expectation prevailed among the Jews that the coming of the Messiah was drawing near. With many, however, interest was primarily in gaining freedom from the heavy yoke of Roman domination.—See MESSIAH.
John’s commission was to ‘turn back the hearts’ of persons to Jehovah, to his covenants, to the “privilege of fearlessly rendering sacred service to him with loyalty and righteousness,” thereby getting ready for Jehovah “a prepared people.” (Luke 1:16, 17, 72-75) He told the people in no uncertain terms that they were facing a time of judgment by God, that “the kingdom of the heavens has drawn near,” making urgent their turning away repentantly from their course of disobedience to God’s will and law. This again emphasized Jehovah’s standard of having only willing subjects, persons who both recognize and appreciate the rightness of his ways and laws.—Matt. 3:1, 2, 7-12.
The Messiah came when Jesus presented himself to John for baptism and was then anointed by God’s holy spirit. (Matt. 3:13-17) He thereby became the King-Designate, the One recognized by Jehovah’s Court as having the “legal right” to the Davidic throne, a right that had not been exercised during the past six centuries. (See JESUS CHRIST [His baptism].) But Jehovah additionally brought this approved Son into a covenant for a heavenly kingdom, in which Jesus would be both King and Priest, as was Melchizedek of ancient Salem. (Ps. 110:1-4; Luke 22:29; Heb. 5:4-6; 7:1-3; 8:1; see COVENANT.) As the promised ‘seed of Abraham’ this heavenly King-Priest would be God’s Chief Agent for blessing persons of all nations.—Gen. 22:15-18; Gal. 3:14; Acts 3:15.
Early in his Son’s earthly life, Jehovah had manifested his kingly power on Jesus’ behalf. God diverted the Oriental astrologers who were going to inform tyrannical King Herod of the young child’s whereabouts, and he caused Jesus’ parents to slip away into Egypt before Herod’s agents carried out the massacre of infants in Bethlehem. (Matt. 2:1-16) Since the original prophecy in Eden had foretold enmity between the promised “seed” and the ‘seed of the serpent,’ this attempt on Jesus’ life could only mean that God’s adversary, Satan the Devil, was trying, however futilely, to frustrate Jehovah’s purpose.—Gen. 3:15.
Now after some forty days in the Judean wilderness, the baptized Jesus was confronted by this principal opponent of Jehovah’s sovereignty. By some means, the spirit adversary conveyed to Jesus certain subtle suggestions designed to draw him into acts violating Jehovah’s expressed will and word. Satan even offered to give to the anointed Jesus dominion over all earthly kingdoms without a struggle and without any need for suffering on Jesus’ part—in exchange for one act of worship toward himself. When Jesus refused, acknowledging Jehovah as the one true Sovereign from whom authority rightly proceeds and to whom worship goes, God’s adversary began drawing up other plans of war strategy against Jehovah’s Representative, resorting to the use of human agents in various ways, as he had done long before in the case of Job.—Job 1:8-18; Matt. 4:1-11; Luke 4:1-13; compare Revelation 13:1, 2.
How the Kingdom was ‘in their midst’
Trusting in Jehovah’s power to protect him and grant him success, Jesus entered his public ministry, announcing to Jehovah’s covenant people that “the appointed time has been fulfilled,” resulting in the approach of the kingdom of God. (Mark 1:14) In determining in what sense the Kingdom was “near,” his words to certain Pharisees may be noted, namely, that “the kingdom of God is in your midst.” (Luke 17:21) Commenting on this text, The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible observes: “Although frequently cited as an example of Jesus’ ‘mysticism’ or ‘inwardness,’ this interpretation rests chiefly upon the old translation, ‘within you,’ [AV,Dy] understood in the unfortunate modern sense of ‘you’ as singular; the ‘you’ (υμών) is plural (Jesus is addressing the Pharisees—vs. 20), . . . The theory that the kingdom of God is an inner state of mind, or of personal salvation, runs counter to the context of this verse, and also to the whole NT presentation of the idea.” (Vol. 2, pp. 882, 883) Since “kingdom [ba·si·leiʹa]” can refer to the “royal dignity,” it is evident that Jesus meant that he, God’s royal representative, the one anointed by God for the kingship, was in their midst. Not only was he present in this capacity, but he also had authority to perform works manifesting God’s kingly power and to prepare candidates for positions within his coming Kingdom rule. Hence the ‘nearness’ of the Kingdom; it was a time of tremendous opportunity.
Governmental arrangement with power and authority
His disciples understood the Kingdom to be an actual government of God, though they did not comprehend the reach of its domain. Nathanael said to Jesus: “Rabbi, you are the Son of God, you are King of Israel.” (John 1:49) They knew the things foretold about the “holy ones” in the prophecy of Daniel. (Dan. 7:18, 27) Jesus directly promised his apostolic followers that they would occupy “thrones.” (Matt. 19:28) James and John sought certain privileged positions in the Messianic government and Jesus acknowledged that there would be such privileged positions, but stated that the assigning of these rested with his Father, the Sovereign Ruler. (Matt. 20:20-23; Mark 10:35-40) So, whereas his disciples mistakenly limited Messiah’s kingly rule to earth and specifically to fleshly Israel, even doing so on the day of the resurrected Jesus’ ascension (Acts 1:6), they correctly understood that it referred to a governmental arrangement.—Compare Matthew 21:5; Mark 11:7-10.
Jehovah’s kingly power toward his earthly creation was visibly demonstrated in many ways by his royal Representative. By God’s spirit or active force, his Son exercised control over wind and sea, vegetation, fish, and even over the organic elements in food, causing the food to be multiplied. These powerful works caused his disciples to develop deep respect for the authority deposited in him. (Matt. 14:23-33; Mark 4:36-41; 11:12-14, 20-23; Luke 5:4-11; John 6:5-15) Even more profoundly impressive was his exercise of God’s power over human bodies, healing afflictions ranging from blindness to leprosy, restoring the dead to life. (Matt. 9:35; 20:30-34; Luke 5:12, 13; 7:11-17; John 11:39-47) Healed lepers he sent to report to the divinely authorized, but generally unbelieving, priesthood, as “a witness to them.” (Luke 5:14; 17:14) Finally, he showed God’s power over superhuman spirits. The demons recognized the authority invested in Jesus and, rather than risk a decisive test of the power backing him up, acceded to his orders to release persons possessed by them. (Matt. 8:28-32; 9:32, 33; compare James 2:19.) Since this powerful expulsion of demons was by God’s spirit, this meant that the kingdom of God had really “overtaken” his listeners.—Matt. 12:25-29; compare Luke 9:42, 43.
All of this was solid proof that Jesus had kingly authority and that this authority came from no earthly, human, political source. (Compare John 18:36; Isaiah 9:6, 7.) Messengers from the imprisoned John the Baptist, as witnesses of these powerful works, were instructed by Jesus to go back to John and tell him what they had seen and heard as confirmation that Jesus was indeed the “Coming One.” (Matt. 11:2-6; Luke 7:18-23; compare John 5:36.) Jesus’ disciples were seeing and hearing the evidence of Kingdom authority that the prophets had longed to witness. (Matt. 13:16, 17) Moreover, Jesus was able to delegate authority to his disciples to exercise similar powers as his appointed deputies, thereby giving force and weight to their proclamation that “the kingdom of the heavens has drawn near.”—Matt. 10:1, 7, 8; Luke 4:36; 10:8-12, 17.
ENTRANCE INTO THE KINGDOM
Jesus emphasized the special period of opportunity that had thus arrived. Of his forerunner John the Baptist, Jesus said: “Among those born of women there has not been raised up a greater than John the Baptist; but a person that is a lesser one in the kingdom of the heavens is greater than he is. But from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of the heavens is the goal toward which men press [bi·aʹze·tai], and those pressing forward [bi·a·staiʹ] are seizing it. [Compare An American Translation; also the Zürcher Bibel (German).] For all, the Prophets and the Law, prophesied until John.” (Matt. 11:10-13) Thus, the days of John’s ministry, soon to end with his execution, marked the close of one period, the start of another. Of the Greek verb bi·aʹzo used in this text, W. E. Vine says “the verb suggests forceful endeavour.” (Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, Vol. III, p. 208) Regarding Matthew 11:12, German scholar Heinrich Meyer states: “In this way is described that eager, irresistible striving and struggling after the approaching Messianic kingdom . . . So eager and energetic (no longer calm and expectant) is the interest in regard to the kingdom. The βιασταί are, accordingly, believers [not enemy attackers] struggling hard for its possession.”—Meyer’s Commentary, Matthew, p. 225.
Membership in the kingdom of God, therefore, would not be easy to gain, not like approaching an open city with little or nothing to make entrance difficult. Rather, the Sovereign, Jehovah God, had placed barriers to shut out any not worthy. (Compare John 6:44; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11; Galatians 5:19-21; Ephesians 5:5.) Those who would enter must traverse a narrow road, find the narrow gate, keep on asking, keep on seeking, keep on knocking and the way would be opened. (Matt. 7:7, 8, 13, 14; compare 2 Peter 1:10, 11.) They might figuratively have to lose an eye or a hand to gain entrance. (Mark 9:43-47) The Kingdom would be no plutocracy in which one could buy the King’s favor; it would be a difficult thing for a rich man (Gr., plouʹsi·os) to enter. (Luke 18:24, 25) It would be no worldly aristocracy; prominent position among men would not count. (Matt. 23:1, 2, 6-12, 33; Luke 16:14-16) Those apparently “first,” having an impressive religious background and record, would be “last,” and the ‘last would be first’ to receive the favored privileges connected with that kingdom. (Matt. 19:30–20:16) The prominent but hypocritical Pharisees, confident of their advantageous position, would see reformed harlots and tax collectors enter the Kingdom before them. (Matt. 21:31, 32; 23:13) Though calling Jesus “Lord, Lord,” all hypocritical persons disrespecting the word and will of God as revealed through Jesus would be turned away with the words: “I never knew you! Get away from me, you workers of lawlessness.”—Matt. 7:15-23.
Those gaining entrance would be those putting material interests secondary and seeking first the Kingdom and God’s righteousness. (Matt. 6:31-34) Like God’s anointed King Christ Jesus, they would love righteousness and hate wickedness. (Heb. 1:8, 9) Spiritually-minded, merciful, pure-hearted, peaceable persons, though the objects of reproach and persecution by men, would become prospective members of the Kingdom. (Matt. 5:3-10; Luke 6:23) The “yoke” Jesus invited such ones to take upon themselves meant submission to his kingly authority. It was a kindly yoke, however, with a light load for those who were “mild-tempered and lowly in heart” as was the King. (Matt. 11:28-30; compare 1 Kings 12:12-14; Jeremiah 27:1-7.) This should have had a heartwarming effect on his listeners, assuring them that his rule would have none of the undesirable qualities of many earlier rulers, both Israelite and non-Israelite. It gave them reason to believe that his rule would bring no burdensome taxation, forced servitude or any forms of exploitation. (Compare 1 Samuel 8:10-18; Deuteronomy 17:15-17, 20; Ephesians 5:5.) As Jesus’ later words showed, not only would the Head of the coming Kingdom government prove his unselfishness to the point of giving his life for his people, but all those associated with him in that government would also be persons who sought to serve rather than be served.—Matt. 20:25-28; see JESUS CHRIST (His works and personal qualities).
Willing submission vital
Jesus himself had the deepest respect for the Sovereign will and authority of his Father. (John 5:30; 6:38; Matt. 26:39) As long as the Law covenant was in effect, his Jewish followers were to practice and advocate obedience to it; any taking an opposite course would be rejected as regards his kingdom. This respect and obedience, however, must be from the heart, not merely carrying out a formal or one-sided observance of the Law with emphasis on specific acts required, but observing the basic principles inherent therein involving justice, mercy and faithfulness. (Matt. 5:17-20; 23:23, 24) To the scribe who acknowledged Jehovah’s unique position and that “loving him with one’s whole heart and with one’s whole understanding and with one’s whole strength and this loving one’s neighbor as oneself is worth far more than all the whole burnt offerings and sacrifices,” Jesus said, “You are not far from the kingdom of God.” (Mark 12:28-34) Thus, in all respects Jesus made clear that Jehovah God seeks only willing subjects, those who prefer his righteous ways and desire fervently to live under his Sovereign authority.
On his last night with his disciples, Jesus spoke to them of a “new covenant” to become operative toward his followers as a result of his ransom sacrifice (Luke 22:19, 20; compare 12:32), he himself serving as the Mediator of that covenant between Jehovah the Sovereign and Jesus’ followers. (1 Tim. 2:5; Heb. 12:24) Additionally, Jesus made a personal covenant with his followers “for a kingdom,” that they might join him in his royal privileges.—Luke 22:28-30; see COVENANT.
Conquest of the world
Although Jesus’ subsequent arrest, trials and execution made his kingly position appear weak, in reality it marked a powerful fulfillment of God’s prophecies and was allowed by God for that reason. (John 19:10, 11; Luke 24:19-27, 44) By his loyalty and integrity until death Jesus proved that “the ruler of the world,” God’s adversary, Satan, had “no hold” on him and that Jesus had indeed “conquered the world.” (John 14:29-31; 16:33) Additionally, even while his Son was impaled on the stake, Jehovah gave evidence of his superior power, the light of the sun being blacked out for a time, then a strong earthquake and the ripping in two of the large curtain in the temple. (Matt. 27:51-54; Luke 23:44, 45) On the third day thereafter, he gave far greater evidence of his Sovereignty as he resurrected his Son to spirit life, despite the puny efforts of men to prevent this, the guards before Jesus’ sealed tomb being ‘scared to death’ by God’s angelic agent used in connection with the event.—Matt. 28:1-7.
Kingdom rule from Pentecost onward
With Jesus’ ascension to heaven, forty days after his resurrection, his disciples began to comprehend the heavenly nature of his kingdom. Ten days later, on Pentecost of the year 33 C.E., they had evidence that he had been “exalted to the right hand of God,” as he poured out holy spirit upon them, empowering them to serve as his witnesses and ambassadors of his kingdom. (Luke 24:46-52; Acts 1:8, 9; 2:1-4, 29-33; 2 Cor. 5:20) The “new covenant” thus became operative toward them and they became the nucleus of a new “holy nation,” spiritual Israel. (1 Pet. 2:9, 10; Gal. 6:16; Heb. 12:22-24) Since Christ was now sitting at his Father’s right hand and was the Head over this congregation, it is evident that his kingly rule was in force toward them from Pentecost 33 C.E. onward. (Eph. 5:23; Heb. 1:3; Phil. 2:9-11) Thus, the apostle could later write: “[God] delivered us from the authority of the darkness and transplanted us into the kingdom of the Son of his love.”—Col. 1:13; compare Luke 22:53.
Yet, as regards those not willingly subjecting themselves, Christ Jesus was not then to take action but, rather, to sit “at the right hand of God, from then on awaiting until his enemies should be placed as a stool for his feet.” (Heb. 10:12, 13; Acts 2:34-36; compare Hebrews 2:8.) Jesus had foretold that there would be an interval of time between his ascension to heaven and the time of his rendering judgment toward both approved subjects and opposers, likening himself to a man “of noble birth” who “traveled to a distant land to secure kingly power for himself and to return.” Rewarding his faithful servants, he would then put to death those who were enemies of his Kingdom rule.—Luke 19:11-27.
THE KINGDOM TAKES UP FULL POWER
The apostle John, writing toward the close of the first century C.E., by means of divine revelation also foresaw the future time when Jehovah God, by means of his Son, would make a specific expression of his rulership, so that, as in the time of David’s bringing up the Ark to Jerusalem, it could be said Jehovah ‘has taken his great power and begun ruling as king.’ This would be because his Deputy King, his son, would now enter into a special, more extensive, phase of rulership and the “kingdom of the world [would] become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he will rule as king forever and ever.” The arrival of this time would mean Jesus Christ’s now taking all necessary measures to clean out opposition to God’s sovereignty both in heaven and on earth.—Rev. 11:15.
The initial action takes place in the heavenly realm; Satan and his demons are defeated and cast down to the earthly realm. This results in the proclamation: “Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ.” (Rev. 12:1-10) During the short period of time remaining to him, this principal adversary, Satan, continues to fulfill the prophecy at Genesis 3:15 by warring against the “remaining ones” of the “seed” of the woman, the “holy ones” due to govern with Christ. (Rev. 12:13-17; compare 13:4-7; Daniel 7:21-27.) Jehovah’s “righteous decrees” are made manifest, nevertheless, and his expressions of judgment come as plagues upon those opposing him, resulting in the destruction of mystic Babylon the Great, the prime persecutor on earth of God’s servants. (Rev. 15:4; 16:1–19:6) Thereafter the kingdom of God with Christ Jesus as anointed Ruler sends its heavenly armies against the rulers of all earthly kingdoms and their armies in an Armageddon fight, bringing them to an end. (Rev. 16:14-16; 19:11-21) This is the answer to the petition to God: “Let your kingdom come. Let your will take place, as in heaven, also upon earth.” (Matt. 6:10) Satan is then abyssed and a thousand-year period begins in which Christ Jesus and his associates rule as kings and priests over earth’s inhabitants.—Rev. 20:1, 6.
The apostle Paul also describes the rule of Christ during his second presence. After Christ resurrects his followers from death he proceeds to bring “to nothing all government and all authority and power” (logically referring to all government, authority and power in opposition to God’s sovereign will). He then “hands over the kingdom to his God and Father,” subjecting himself to the “One who subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone.”—l Cor. 15:21-28.
Since Christ’s kingdom is specifically and repeatedly shown to be an everlasting kingdom, having no end, it is apparent that his ‘handing over the kingdom to God’ is in a particular sense. (Isa. 9:7; Dan. 7:14; Luke 1:33; 2 Pet. 1:11; Rev. 11:15) During the thousand-year reign Christ’s rule toward earth has involved priestly action toward obedient mankind. (Rev. 5:9, 10; 20:6; 21:1-3) By this means the dominion of Kings Sin and Death over obedient mankind, subjected to their “law,” ends; undeserved kindness and righteousness are the ruling factors. (Rom. 5:14, 17, 21) Since sin and death are to be completely removed from earth’s inhabitants, this also brings to an end the need for Jesus’ serving as a “helper with the Father” in the sense of providing propitiation for the sins of imperfect humans. (1 John 2:1, 2) That brings mankind back to the original status enjoyed when the perfect man Adam was in Eden. Adam while perfect needed no one to stand between him and God as a propitiatory covering. So, too, at the termination of Jesus’ thousand-year rule (1 Cor. 15:24), earth’s inhabitants will be both in position and under responsibility to answer for their course of action before Jehovah God as the Supreme Judge, without recurrence to anyone as legal intermediary or helper. Jehovah, the Sovereign Power, thus becomes “all things to everyone.” This means, then, that Christ Jesus has completed a particular phase of his rule, that his special “administration” to “gather all things together again in the Christ, the things in the heavens and the things on the earth,” has now accomplished its purpose.—1 Cor. 15:28; Eph. 1:9, 10.
It therefore appears that he ‘turns the kingdom over to his Father’ particularly in the sense of being able to present to his Father a sin-free earth, all its inhabitants once again completely submissive to his Father’s sovereign will. (Compare the ‘casting of crowns’ before God’s throne by heavenly creatures to represent full submission, at Revelation 4:9-11.) Earth, once a focus of rebellion, is restored to a full, clean and undisputed position in the realm or domain of the Universal Sovereign.
Following this, however, a final test is made of the integrity and devotion of all such earthly subjects. God’s adversary is loosed from his restraint in the abyss. Those yielding to his seduction do so on the same issue raised in Eden: the rightfulness of God’s sovereignty. This is seen by their attacking the “camp of the holy ones and the beloved city.” Since that issue has been judicially settled and declared closed by the Court of heaven, no prolonged rebellion is permitted in this case. Those failing to stand loyally on God’s side will not be able to appeal to Christ Jesus as a ‘propitiatory helper, but Jehovah God will be “all things” to them, with no appeal or mediation possible. All rebels, spirit and human, receive the divine sentence of destruction in the “second death.”—Rev. 20:7-15.
The kingdom of God by his Son, Christ Jesus, thereafter continues its rule as the royal instrument for expressing the Sovereign will to all future times and in whatever assignments God’s boundless wisdom and love determine. Its domain embraces heaven and earth, angels and humans being subject to it, while it continues subject to Jehovah, the King of eternity.—1 Cor. 15:27, 28; Phil. 2:9, 10; Heb. 1:5-9; Rev. 5:10; 21:1-4.