New Testament, in a comment on Acts 2:27, says that the Hebrew word hha·sidhʹ (used in Psalm 16:10) denotes not only one who is godly and pious, but also one who is the object of God’s loving-kindness.

LOYALTY REQUIRED BY GOD

Loyalty in his servants is required by Jehovah. They must copy him. (Eph. 5:1) The apostle Paul tells Christians that they “should put on the new personality which was created according to God’s will in true righteousness and loyalty.” (Eph. 4:24) In recommending prayer in the congregation, he says: “Therefore I desire that in every place the men carry on prayer, lifting up loyal hands, apart from wrath and debates.” (1 Tim. 2:8) Loyalty is one of the qualities essential in qualifying a man for appointment to the office of overseer in the congregation of God.—Titus 1:8; see KINDNESS.

LUCIUS

(Luʹcius) [illuminative].

1. A man of Cyrene who was associated with the Antioch, Syria, congregation when Paul set out from there on his first missionary journey.—Acts 13:1-3.

2. A Christian “relative” of Paul who was with him in Corinth during his third missionary tour when the apostle wrote his letter to the Romans. Lucius is a name of Latin origin. He joined in sending greetings to Christians in Rome.—Rom. 16:21.

LUD, LUDIM

(Luʹdim).

1. A son of Shem (Gen. 10:22; 1 Chron. 1:17) whose descendants were identified by Josephus (and others) with the Lydians of SW Asia Minor. (Antiquities of the Jews, Book I, chap. VI, par. 4) Assyrian inscriptions of the seventh century B.C.E. referred to the Lydians as Luddu.

2. A descendant of Ham through Mizraim. (Gen. 10:6, 13; 1 Chron. 1:8, 11) The people descended from this Hamitic Lud are evidently the “Ludim” noted for their proficiency with the bow who, together with Hamitic Put and Cush, were incorporated in Egyptian military forces. (Jer. 46:8, 9; compare Ezekiel 30:4, 5.) A similar allusion to the bow-drawing Lud at Isaiah 66:19 would seem to point to the Hamitic, rather than the Semitic, Lud as those included among nations far away from Israel. The Ludim who rendered military service for Tyre are more difficult to identify. (Ezek. 27:3, 10) Their being linked in the text with Put, however, may again point to the Hamitic Ludim.

The texts referred to would logically place the Hamitic Ludim in N Africa, but it is not possible to locate them more definitely. Some scholars situate them in the general vicinity of Libya, but do so on the basis of an arbitrary alteration of the spelling of the name to Lub instead of Lud.

LUGGAGE

The Hebrew term k^eliʹ, sometimes rendered “luggage” and “baggage,” has a broad application and pertains to “something finished, accomplished, prepared.” It can apply to luggage or baggage in a camp.

An army camp, travelers, those gathering to an assembly away from their homes, and so forth, would have with them the necessary items as luggage or baggage. (1 Sam. 10:21, 22; 17:22; 25:9-13) David established the rule in Israel that the men left behind to guard the baggage during military campaigns should share the spoils of victory equally with the fighting men.—1 Sam. 30:21-25.

Egypt was told to outfit herself for exile by making “baggage for exile,” her fall to Babylon being certain, as foretold through the prophet Jeremiah. (Jer. 46:13, 19) In broad daylight, as part of a symbolic enactment relating to Jerusalem’s coming exile to Babylon, Ezekiel brought “luggage for exile” out of his house.—Ezek. 12:1-4, 7-11.

LUHITH

(Luʹhith) [possibly, of tablets or planks].

A place mentioned in prophecies of doom against Moab. (Isa. 15:1, 5; Jer. 48:5) Some scholars believe that Luhith was a Moabite city located at the top of an ascent. Identified by Eusebius and Jerome with a place called Loueitha, Luhith has been linked with either modern Khirbet Mendint er Ras, about five miles (8 kilometers) E of the southern end of the Dead Sea, or nearby Khirbet Fas. Another view is that Luhith was not a city but merely the name of the ascent or slope to be used by the fleeing and weeping Moabite refugees.—Compare Numbers 34:4.

LUKE

[Gr., Lou·kasʹ, evidently a contracted and affectionate form of the Latin name Lucius or Lucanus].

A physician and faithful companion of the apostle Paul. He was the writer of the Gospel of Luke and of the Acts of Apostles. That Luke was well educated is apparent from his writings. Also, his background as a doctor is noticeable in his use of medical terms.—Luke 4:38; Acts 28:8.

Luke did not speak of himself as an eyewitness of the events in the life of Christ that are recorded in his Gospel account. (Luke 1:2) So, he apparently became a believer sometime after Pentecost of 33 C.E.

In the book of Acts, Luke is referred to in an indirect way by the use of the pronouns “we” and “us.” (Acts 16:10-17; 20:5–21:18; 27:1–28:16) He was with Paul at Troas on the apostle’s second missionary tour and accompanied him from there to Philippi, where he may have remained until Paul’s return on his third missionary journey. Luke accompanied Paul to Palestine at the end of that missionary tour (Acts 21:7, 8, 15) and, while the apostle was imprisoned for about two years at Caesarea, Luke probably wrote his Gospel account there (about 56-58 C.E.). He accompanied Paul on his trip to Rome for trial (Acts 27:1; 28:16), likely completing the book of Acts in Rome about 61 C.E., since it covers events down to that year but does not record the outcome of Paul’s appeal to Caesar.

Luke joined Paul in sending greetings to Christians at Colossae when Paul wrote to them from Rome (c. 60-61 C.E.) and the apostle identified him as “the beloved physician.” (Col. 4:14) In writing to Philemon from Rome (about 60-61 C.E.), Paul included greetings from Luke, referring to him as one of his “fellow workers.” (Philem. 24; AV, Lucas) That Luke stuck close to Paul and was with him shortly before the apostle’s martyrdom is evident from Paul’s remark, “Luke alone is with me.”—2 Tim. 4:11.

Some hold that Luke was a Gentile, basing this mainly on Colossians 4:11, 14. Because Paul first mentioned “those circumcised” (vs. 11) and later referred to Luke (vs. 14), the implication is drawn that Luke was not of the circumcision and hence was not a Jew. But this is by no means conclusive, and there is specific evidence against it at Romans 3:1, 2, where Paul shows that God entrusted his inspired utterances to the Jews. Luke is one of those to whom such inspired utterances were entrusted.

The Scriptures likewise furnish no basis for identifying Luke with the Lucius mentioned at Acts 13:1 or Paul’s “relative” of the same name referred to at Romans 16:21.

LUKE, GOOD NEWS ACCORDING TO

An account primarily relating the events of Jesus’ earthly ministry. Its purpose was to present an accurate record in logical order, verifying the certainty of what Theophilus had been taught orally. (Luke 1:3, 4) As suggested by its having a place in the Bible canon, this record was also to benefit many other persons, both Jews and non-Jews. Whereas topical arrangement appears to predominate at times, this Gospel follows a chronological order in general outline.

WRITER AND TIME WRITTEN

Although not named therein, the physician Luke (Col. 4:14) has generally been credited with the writership of this account. There is written evidence to this effect from as early as the second century C.E., the Gospel being attributed to Luke in the